IVF & assisted reproduction
A large, rigorous trial of 848 women undergoing IVF found no difference in live births between acupuncture and sham acupuncture. The Cochrane review found no evidence that acupuncture improves live birth or pregnancy rates. A 2019 review found more pregnancies when acupuncture was compared with no added treatment, but not when compared with sham — suggesting general effects such as relaxation and support. Some patients choose acupuncture for comfort and stress support during IVF; it should not be thought of as increasing the chance of a baby.
5 sources
- [1]Smith CA, de Lacey S, Chapman M, et al. Effect of Acupuncture vs Sham Acupuncture on Live Births Among Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;319(19):1990-1998. PubMed 29800212 (opens in a new tab) · DOI 10.1001/jama.2018.5336 (opens in a new tab)· randomized controlled trial (sham-controlled)
- [2]Cheong YC, Dix S, Hung Yu Ng E, et al. Acupuncture and assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(7):CD006920. PubMed 23888428 (opens in a new tab) · DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD006920.pub3 (opens in a new tab)· Cochrane systematic review
- [3]Smith CA, Armour M, Shewamene Z, et al. Acupuncture performed around the time of embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(3):364-379. PubMed 30658892 (opens in a new tab) · DOI 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.038 (opens in a new tab)· systematic review and meta-analysis
- [4]Su C, Wang X, Liu X, et al. Effect of acupuncture for poor ovarian response: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Front Endocrinol. 2026;17:1765527. PubMed 41837144 (opens in a new tab) · DOI 10.3389/fendo.2026.1765527 (opens in a new tab)· randomized controlled trial (no sham control)
- [5]Wang Y, Ji J, Duan N, Yin Y. Acupuncture as an adjunctive therapy on embryo transfer day: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical pregnancy and live birth outcomes. Front Reprod Health. 2025;7. PubMed 41064015 (opens in a new tab) · DOI 10.3389/frph.2025.1673144 (opens in a new tab)· systematic review and meta-analysis


